Most engineering leaders assume that if AI helps developers write code faster, software gets to production faster too. ClearRoute CEO, James Jarvis, says the data tells a different story and understanding why, matters for anyone setting AI investment priorities this year.
ClearRoute's State of the Route to Live Report 2026 research found that AI is accelerating development work without shortening the path to live software. Jarvis explains the reasoning plainly: producing more code faster does nothing for a business until that code is actually deployed and generating value. Until then, it sits as a cost rather than a return.
The constraint sits downstream of coding, in the layers of oversight that decide whether something is safe and ready to launch, including security checks, approval steps and testing standards. A newer, leaner company can ship an idea within days. Larger, more established organisations often take months for the same step. Speeding up the coding stage without addressing that gap simply pushes the pressure further down the pipeline rather than relieving it.
Jarvis frames AI as an amplifier of whatever operating model already exists. Organisations with strong engineering discipline see AI compound their advantage. Organisations with slow or fragmented release processes see AI compound that friction instead. This reframes the leadership question from "how do we get more AI" to "what state is our delivery pipeline in before we add more throughput to it."
Drawing from his regular conversations with C-level executives at large, regulated organisations, Jarvis identifies four recurring challenges:
He notes that at scale, this becomes as much a conversation about culture and change as it is about technology.
ClearRoute's own shift to an AI native operating model started with building an internal platform on foundational primitives, led by Global Head of Engineering and AI, Justin Wilkin. From there, every employee, technical and non-technical, received access to build internal skills and agents. Today, agents support parts of HR, talent acquisition, finance, operations and sales, all coordinated through Orbit, ClearRoute's platform for running and overseeing agents, with governance, access controls and cost tracking built in from the start.
ClearRoute also placed more than 50 AI-focused architects directly with clients to identify real workflows and turn them into standing, well-managed systems the business can build on, rather than isolated builds that live on one person's laptop. The distinction Jarvis draws is between AI experimentation and AI infrastructure. Only the latter compounds.
Jarvis applies the same approach to his own workflow. An agent monitors Salesforce and surfaces pipeline changes without requiring him to log in. On calls, an agent transcribes, logs activity and drafts follow up emails in his tone for review. Board reporting now pulls from MCP connected systems into a branded pack with analysis and recommendations, which the team validates before use. In talent acquisition, agents screen incoming applications against an ideal candidate profile and produce a weekly conversion report by channel, freeing a small team to focus where their judgement adds the most value.
Explore the full State of the Route to Live 2026 report for the complete data behind this gap.
Read the full interview with James Jarvis on TechInformed for more on his approach to AI native leadership.
.jpg)
Most engineering leaders assume that if AI helps developers write code faster, software gets to production faster too. ClearRoute CEO, James Jarvis, says the data tells a different story and understanding why, matters for anyone setting AI investment priorities this year.
ClearRoute's State of the Route to Live Report 2026 research found that AI is accelerating development work without shortening the path to live software. Jarvis explains the reasoning plainly: producing more code faster does nothing for a business until that code is actually deployed and generating value. Until then, it sits as a cost rather than a return.
The constraint sits downstream of coding, in the layers of oversight that decide whether something is safe and ready to launch, including security checks, approval steps and testing standards. A newer, leaner company can ship an idea within days. Larger, more established organisations often take months for the same step. Speeding up the coding stage without addressing that gap simply pushes the pressure further down the pipeline rather than relieving it.
Jarvis frames AI as an amplifier of whatever operating model already exists. Organisations with strong engineering discipline see AI compound their advantage. Organisations with slow or fragmented release processes see AI compound that friction instead. This reframes the leadership question from "how do we get more AI" to "what state is our delivery pipeline in before we add more throughput to it."
Drawing from his regular conversations with C-level executives at large, regulated organisations, Jarvis identifies four recurring challenges:
He notes that at scale, this becomes as much a conversation about culture and change as it is about technology.
ClearRoute's own shift to an AI native operating model started with building an internal platform on foundational primitives, led by Global Head of Engineering and AI, Justin Wilkin. From there, every employee, technical and non-technical, received access to build internal skills and agents. Today, agents support parts of HR, talent acquisition, finance, operations and sales, all coordinated through Orbit, ClearRoute's platform for running and overseeing agents, with governance, access controls and cost tracking built in from the start.
ClearRoute also placed more than 50 AI-focused architects directly with clients to identify real workflows and turn them into standing, well-managed systems the business can build on, rather than isolated builds that live on one person's laptop. The distinction Jarvis draws is between AI experimentation and AI infrastructure. Only the latter compounds.
Jarvis applies the same approach to his own workflow. An agent monitors Salesforce and surfaces pipeline changes without requiring him to log in. On calls, an agent transcribes, logs activity and drafts follow up emails in his tone for review. Board reporting now pulls from MCP connected systems into a branded pack with analysis and recommendations, which the team validates before use. In talent acquisition, agents screen incoming applications against an ideal candidate profile and produce a weekly conversion report by channel, freeing a small team to focus where their judgement adds the most value.
Explore the full State of the Route to Live 2026 report for the complete data behind this gap.
Read the full interview with James Jarvis on TechInformed for more on his approach to AI native leadership.